BERLIN (AFP) –
Chancellor Angela Merkel defended on Friday Germany’s Afghanistan mission at a memorial service for the latest three German soldiers killed there, the first post-WWII leader to attend such an event.

“Our troops perform their service and fight in Afghanistan because we want to prevent terrorists attacking us here in Germany as well,” Merkel said at the ceremony in a small church near the soldiers’ barracks in northwest Germany.

“Our mission in Afghanistan is tough,” she said. “But we cannot just absolve ourselves of our political responsibility for a stable Afghanistan from one day to the next, and just leave.”

With the unpopular mission turning increasingly violent, Merkel flew back from a holiday early to pay her respects at the ceremony. After speaking, she bowed her head at the three coffins in turn, each draped in a German flag.

The deaths in a Taliban ambush of Nils Bruns, 35, Robert Hartert, 25, and Martin Augustyniak, 28, in northern Afghanistan on April 2 brought to 39 the number of German military personnel to have died there since 2002.

Read the whole hot breaking news

London –
Michelle Obama’s popularity hasn’t gone unnoticed by British political spin-doctors. Well before Prime Minister Gordon Brown fired the starting gun Tuesday for the Britain general election campaign, the wives of both the Labour and Conservative leaders had been playing increasingly important roles designed to enhance their partners’ appeal to voters. The unprecedented importance of political spouses – Tory leader David Cameron calls his wife Samantha his “secret weapon” – is just one of the ways in which the campaign resembles a US presidential election like none before.

Like a political version of the WWII film The Americanization of Emily, in which a roguish James Garner plies English rose Julie Andrews with pilfered US chocolate and nylons, Britain’s politicians are reaching across the Atlantic to woo voters. Tactics and strategies include the use of Obama-style Internet campaigning to harness grassroots activists, negative campaigning offensives which target specific personalities, US-style presidential debates — and political consultants on both sides who assisted the successful 2008 Obama campaign. The focus on personalities demonstrates how British general elections have started to resemble presidential-style races rather than battles between competing power blocs, even though there is clear blue water between both of the main parties on economic issues in this campaign. Why the change? UK voters want it that way. “This is the first election where the individual leaders have actually been as high as the policies in terms of priorities identified by voters,” says Roger Mortimore, Head of Political Research at pollsters Ipsos MORI.

Charisma mattersNo surprise then that the Tories have been hammering away at Brown, as woefully lacking the charisma and communication skills of his predecessor, Tony Blair. Mr. Brown’s wife, Sarah, has been playing a key role in efforts to humanize the Labour Party leader’s often distant and dour image, introducing him at last year’s Labour Party conference as “My husband, my hero.” Formerly a formidable public relations executive who chose to focus on her family and charity work after marrying Brown, her public profile has grown over the past year while her one million plus followers on the social networking site Twitter amount to six times the membership of the Labour party. Conservative activists are hoping that her success can be emulated by Samantha Cameron, the creative director of a luxury goods company and blue-blooded descendant of King Charles II. The postures, pronouncements and – most of all the clothes – worn by both women have become permanent daily fixtures of press coverage, something which both Cameron and Brown seem to be in no hurry to stop. Why? The answer may be the crucial importance all parties are attaching to female voters, a demographic who favored Labour in the past two elections but who currently back the Conservatives in polls by 37 points to 29.

Soccer ‘mums’?The US-experience has been influential in this regard according to Sarah Lapham, a Texas-born public relations consultant now living in London. “Many people believe it was a soccer mum vote which pushed Obama over the edge to win the US election, and it’s also a factor here,” she adds. Sam Baker, editor-in-chief of Red Magazine, one of Britain’s leading women’s magazines, agrees that the influence of Michelle Obama has been a factor in the current election campaign, but adds that attempts to specifically target the votes of women have been a fixture of British politics since at least the mid 90s.

Then, “Worcester Woman” became shorthand for a type of middle-class female voter that Labour needed to win over to capture formerly solid Tory seats. “It is true to say though that ever since Blair, campaigns have become a lot more presidential in style and much more about personality,” says Ms. Baker. Similarities to last year’s US election meanwhile also extend to cyberspace. In particular, Labour has invested heavily in strategies to help party members access databases that allow them to contact voters and build relationships. “Historically Labour has used technology as a form of control,” Douglas Alexander, the party’s election co-coordinator told the Guardian in February. “We would use pagers and faxes to send out messages telling people what line to take. The key learning from the Obama campaign is to use technology to empower your supporters.” According to Ms. Lapham, the PR executive, the ways in which both of the main parties have deployed new social media mirrors the way they are approaching the campaign as a whole. While Labour’s approach has been more “issue specific,” the Conservatives have sought to capitalize on the popularity of their leader through “Webcameron,” a video blog which has featured him talking to voters while being filmed doing chores at home in the family kitchen. Next week will see the advent of Britain’s most conspicuous import from American elections – televised debates.

Read the whole hot breaking news

STOCKHOLM – New evidence from Russian archives suggests Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg, credited with rescuing tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews during the Holocaust, was alive after Soviets reported that he had died in a Moscow prison, a Swedish magazine and U.S. researchers reported Thursday.

The fate of Wallenberg, who was arrested in Budapest in January 1945 by the Soviet army, has remained one of the great mysteries of World War II.

The Soviets claimed he was executed July 17, 1947 but never produced a reliable death certificate or his remains. Witnesses claim he was seen in Soviet prisons or labor camps many years later, although those accounts were never verified.

Now, the archives of the Russian Security Services say a man identified only as Prisoner No. 7, who was interrogated six days after the diplomat’s reported death, was “with great likelihood” Wallenberg.

The security services reported the find last November to Susanne Berger and Vadim Birstein, two members of a research team that conducted a 10-year investigation into Wallenberg’s disappearance in the 1990s.

Read the whole hot breaking news